College students rally over tuition, education quality

Addendums from 3/5/10:

Campus Party Europe

Campus Party Europe
Technology, creativity and digital culture; talent and innovation

The Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation presents in Madrid from 14th – 18th April, and during the Spanish Presidency of the European Union, Campus Party Europe: a special edition of what is considered the biggest event for technology, creativity and digital culture online in the world.  For four days, 800 young people from each of the 27 member states of the EU will participate in activities such as conferences, workshops and challenges centred around three knowledge areas: Science, Digital Creativity and Innovation.

 

Campus Party Europe - 2010

Tagged with:  

From DSC:
In addition to the piece below, also see College for $99 a month and Online courses can reduce the costly sting of college.

Is StraighterLine.com the “Forthcoming Walmart of Education” that I’ve been talking about…? Perhaps. And please don’t get me wrong here. I am not referring to any of this in a derogatory sense. No no. In fact, whomever gets it right will have the best, most-sophisticated, interactive content around — and provided in a format that turns the control over to the students. All of this will be accompanied by 24x7x365 student support, the best systems/infrastructure/technologies, and more.

Check out the following piece: Can You Really Go to College for $99? — from Fox 5 News

Can you really go to college for $99 month?

Online college services company raises $5.5 million in venture backing — from statesman.com by Lori Hawkins

Austin-based MyEdu , an online service for college students, has raised $5.5 million from Bain Capital Ventures to expand its marketing efforts and product development.

Founded in 2008 by software veteran Michael Crosno , MyEdu operates a Web-based service that helps students make decisions about their courses, schedules, professors and majors. The company said more than 2 million students have used MyEdu, which offers academic data from 750 universities.

He started MyEdu by acquiring Austin-based Pick-A-Prof (emphasis DSC), which was co-founded in 2000 by Chris Chilek and John Cunningham , William Cunningham’s son.

Pick-A-Prof had built a base of 1.5 million users at 200 universities by providing online information about professors, including grading patterns, average drop rates and student reviews, as well as schedule planners.

MyEdu estimates that the average cost of a dropped class is $3,000 and that 70 percent of students transfer schools or change majors, resulting in five to six classes that don’t count toward their degree.

From DSC:
Why do I post this? Because it points out the continuing shift in power that is starting to be enjoyed by the students of our universities and colleges. They are now able to obtain information from other students who have taken course XYZ at U of ABC and can get information about that experience.

I’m not saying that all of this is a good thing, as many students might try to find out who’s giving all A’s and just go with those folks. This may not serve our students — and our society — very well in the long run. As frequently the case with tech-enabled directions like this, there seems to be advantages on one hand, and disadvantages on the other.  For example, when the myEdu site says, “Choose the best professors” — the “best professors” for one student might be very different for what constitutes the “best professors” for another.


(Audio) Laura Perna: How to help college students who work — from The Chronicle

Many undergraduates work to support themselves during college, but institutions sometimes struggle to support those students. Laura W. Perna, an associate professor of higher education at the University of Pennsylvania, has edited a new book on that topic, and she offers advice on what colleges can do better.

The book, Understanding the Working College Student: New Research and Its Implications for Policy and Practice, is to be released by Stylus Publishing on February 26.

Tagged with:  

College Students of the Future – They’re Different — from LearningDigitally.org

From DSC:
This is what I have been trying to get folks geared up for, at least where I work. For now, we must cultivate a culture of being able to change — to be adaptable and flexible — because if we want to continue to optimize our educational efforts, we need to be able to address a different kind of student.

Some excerpts from this posting include:

“Her point: ‘If I’m a college CIO (chief information officer) or CTO (chief technology officer), and I’m only thinking about the 100 percent online class that my students are looking for, then I’m not properly preparing for that next generation of students coming up, who want a blended approach. I want to be building for kids I’m going to see five-plus years from now.’”

“Evans lists nine attributes that characterize these students:
– They’re self-directed in their learning.
– They’re untethered from traditional education.
– They’re expert at personal data aggregation.
– They engage in the power of connections.
– They create new communities.
– They’re not tethered to physical networks.
– They prefer experiential learning.
– They’re content developers.
– The process is as important as – and sometimes more important than – the knowledge gained.”

Learning Styles and Tuition Dollars — from Joshua Kim; Joshua is quoted below:

Colleges and universities that invest in creating personalized learning opportunities (emphasis DSC) will gain significant advantages in the competitive market for students.

Some attributes that we will look for in selecting a college:

– A philosophy to play to the strengths of its learners as opposed to correcting their weaknesses.

– The delivery of course and learning materials in formats (and on platforms) that are flexible enough to match a range of learning styles.

– An emphasis on supporting learners in finding their passions and in transitioning to creators and leaders.

Some things that we will not consider in choosing where our tuition dollars go:

– The U.S. News & World Report rankings. Rankings are for the median student, not my student. Your school needs to be the best for my student, not for all students.

– The dorms, the grounds, the gym, etc. etc. We expect these amenities. They are not differentiators.

– The number of books in the library. Books are not scarce, and my kid can only read one at a time.

McGraw-Hill brings together social media & education experts to discuss the future of digital innovation in higher education

  • Geo-tagging will be a powerful tool for higher education
  • The Apple iPad will have a significant impact in the education market
  • The “smudging” of technologies: Augmented reality, mobile computing and crowdsourcing.
  • Social media can help solve the student engagement crisis.
  • In order for both students and instructors to engage in social media, there needs to be a level of incentive.

Be sure to check out their GradeGuru video/piece for:

  • An interesting new incentive system for students
  • An engaging way to relay information
  • A great illustration of the power of the web to aid in sharing educationally-related information; social learning
  • A way to find other students who have good notes

From DSC:
I was reading the Daily Drucker today and I ran across an entry entitled,  “The Educated Person” (p.43). Two quotes stood out at me on that page:

“The education person needs to bring knowledge to bear on the present, not to mention molding the future.”

“Postcapitalist society needs the educated person even more than any earlier society did, and access to the great heritage of the past will have to be an essential element. But liberal education must enable the person to understand reality and master it (emphasis DSC).”

From DSC:
This speaks to the need for liberal arts and other forms of education…but it also speaks to me of the need to balance the academic world with the world as it is. We must educate our students so that they can hit the ground running (as best as possible) upon graduation. To me, this means (at least in part) being able to understand and utilize various technologies to obtain and synthesize accurate, up-to-date information.  Students need to be able to build their own learning ecosystems and keep them up and running…thriving…throughout their entire lives.

From DSC:
The following article got me to thinking of the future again…

Thousands to lose jobs as universities prepare to cope with cuts — from guardian.co.uk (original posting from Stephen Downes)
Post-graduates to replace professors | Staff poised to strike over proposals of cuts

I post this here because I believe that we are at the embryonic stages of some massive changes that will take place within the world of higher education. The timeframe for these changes, as always, is a bit uncertain. However, I would expect to see some of the following changes to occur (or continue to occur) yet this year:

  • Cost cutting
  • The cutting of programs
  • Laying off of staff and faculty
  • Not filling open positions
  • More outsourcing
  • The move towards using more cloud-based-computing models
  • The movement of students to lower-cost alternatives
  • Greater utilization of informal learning
  • The rise of online-exchange oriented offerings (i.e. the matching up of those who teach a subject and those who want to learn that subject)
  • The threat to traditional ways of doing things and to traditional organizations — including accreditation agencies — will cause people within those agencies to be open to thinking differently (though this one will take longer to materialize)
  • The continued growth of online learning — albeit at a greatly-reduced price
  • …and more.

This isn’t just about a recession. The Internet is changing the game on yet another industry — this time, it’s affecting those of us in the world of higher education. When the recession’s over, we won’t be going back to the way higher education was set up previous to the year 2010.

What did those us of in higher education learn from what happened to the music industry? What did we learn from what happened to the video distribution/entertainment business? To the journalism industry? To the brokerage business? To the travel and hospitality industries? To the bookstores of the world?

Along these lines…back at the end of 2008, I posted a vision entitled, The Forthcoming Walmart of Education. So, where are we on that vision? Well…so far we have:

  • Straighterline.com
  • A significant open courseware movement, including MIT Open Courseware, the Open Courseware Consortium, Connexions, Open Content Alliance, OpenLearn, Intute, Globe, Open Yale Courses, Open Education, The Internet Archive and many others
  • University of the People
  • YouTube.edu
  • iTunes U
  • Academic Earth
  • and more…

I realize that several of these items were in place before or during 2008…however, at that time, there was no dominant, inexpensive alternative. And there still isn’t one that has jumped into the lead (the University of Phoenix with their 150,000+ students doesn’t qualify, as their pricing is not yet nearly aggressive enough as what I’m predicting will occur).

Though we aren’t there yet, there has been significant change that has already taken place. So…if I were an administrator right now, I’d be asking myself the following key questions:

  • Can we reduce tuition and fees by at least 50%? If not, how can some of our offerings be delivered at half the price (or more)?
  • How are we going to differentiate ourselves?
  • How are we going to deliver value?
  • How are we going to keep from becoming a commodity?
  • Are we using teams to create and deliver our courses? If not, why not? What’s our plans for staying competitive if we don’t use teams?

Most likely, further massive changes are forthcoming.  So fasten your seatbelts and try to stay marketable!



Successful Techniques and Proven Strategies for Finding Online Work. — from elearning-certificate.blogspot.com

Tagged with:  

The Future of Higher Education: Beyond the Campus — from iangardnergb.blogspot.com

“Lots and lots at the time being on the future of HE, especially in the UK due to the funding cuts, imminent election, etc. One of the latest reports is a joint one from JISC, SERF, EDUCAUSE and CAUDIT, showing many issues are not just affecting the UK.

Abstract:
Higher education’s purpose is to equip students for success in life—in the workplace, in communities, and in their personal lives. While this purpose may have remained constant for centuries, the world around colleges and universities is undergoing significant change. Higher education is under pressure to meet greater expectations, whether for student numbers, educational preparation, workforce needs, or economic development. Meanwhile, the resources available are likely to decline. New models, an intense focus on the student experience, and a drive for innovation and entrepreneurism will ensure that higher education continues to meet society’s needs. Information technology supports virtually every aspect of higher education, including finances, learning, research, security, and sustainability, and IT professionals need to understand the range of problems their institutions face so they apply IT where it brings greatest value. Creating this future will require collaboration across organizational and national boundaries, bringing together the collective intelligence of people from backgrounds including education, corporations, and government.

From DSC:
Many quotes jumped off of the pages of the report, but here’s one of them:

Higher education represents a complex, adaptive system that is influenced by larger societal trends and information technology. If higher education is adaptive, what will its future be?

From DSC:
I’ve been reflecting upon the assessment of student learning the last few days; and, in my research, I’ve seen some items that seem to point to doing things for the benefit of those administering these items. For example, I saw that one of the qualities of a good assessment is that it needs to be “easy to administer, score, and interpret”.

I understand this need to manage learning/learners/assessment, but I wonder…are we doing things for our needs and purposes of educating people?  (Other examples include: Using semesters or quarters |  50 – 90 minute class periods | This class is only available on… | We offer that course only in the… | etc.)

Could we do things any differently?Are there ways to enable student learning to be fuller? Freer? More spontaneous? At their own pace?

A related reflection here:
Recently, due to so many things being on my plate, I fell behind in a class.  As 2, 3, and then 4 days passed, I still hadn’t been able to get back to several of the assignments that I needed to get done. It weighed heavily on my mind…and it generated some anxiety within me. Then, I reflected on what it must feel like for students who don’t learn as fast or who need more time to get something — but, due to the way the system works — they don’t have the time or the liberty to take things at their own pace.

(No surprise to anyone reading this blog) Over time, this type of thing can lead to not only anxiety within learners, but can lead to depression and being “bumbed out” on education and learning in general. “This school thing…it’s not for me.” “I can’t keep up.” The belief that “I’m no good at this school thing!” — can lead to a serious waste of talents and abilities.

It is my hope that as we move through the next 10-20 years, education can be done in such a way that:

  • Enables more control of the pacing of the learning to be turned over to the students
  • Allows students to select from the media that works best for them
  • Helps students identify their true passions — STEM-related or not — and then use those passions to drive learning in other areas
© 2024 | Daniel Christian