Using VoiceThread to build student engagement — from Faculty Focus by John Orlando, PhD

Online educators have long known that asynchronous discussion is deeper than face-to-face discussion due to the increased thought time and the “democratization” of the classroom. But one major disadvantage of traditional online discussion is that it is separate from the lecture.

Students in a face-to-face classroom can stop the instructor during the lecture to ask questions, whereas students in an online classroom generally read or watch the lecture at one time and then discuss it in a separate forum later. Any questions or thoughts that the students have during the lecture are generally forgotten by the time that the students reach discussion. Plus, online discussion is usually tracked into preset questions determined by the instructor.

But a new technology allows online instructors to reconnect discussion to the lecture. VoiceThread is a web service that allows users to upload PowerPoint slides, videos, photos, etc. and add voice narration to create a multimedia presentation. But best of all, viewers can add their own comments to the presentation via voice or text. With VoiceThread students can attach questions or thoughts about a lecture directly to the lecture itself when and where they apply. The result is a discussion that is integrated into the lecture itself.

VoiceThread opens up new possibilities for greater interactivity and richer experiences in online teaching and learning. Give us 20 minutes and we’ll show you how to use this powerful tool to enrich your classes. Learn more »

The advantages of VoiceThread include:

Student driven discussion:
Discussion originates from the students themselves, and thus students tend to bring more of themselves into the conversation. Discussion is freer and more open, touching on a wider variety of issues.

A growing lecture:
Discussion in a traditional online forum never leaves the classroom. The class is archived and discussion forums are wiped clean for the next group, meaning that the insights are lost. But because discussion in VoiceThread is attached to the lecture itself, which can then be used for the next class, students are adding to the lecture itself, which grows from class to class. Students contribute to an ongoing conversation with future classes.

Improved social presence:
Students find that the ability to see and hear their instructor and classmates improves the sense of social presence of others in the classroom.

Better understanding of nuance:
Students are better able to understand the nuances of discussion when they can hear the tone in someone’s voice.

Student Projects:
VoiceThreads are a great way for students to deliver projects and solicit feedback from others.
New users can create up to three VoiceThreads for free, and after that reduced higher ed pricing is available. VoiceThreads can be password protected to provide the same level of security as any learning management system. Set one up and try it yourself!

To learn more about VoiceThread and how it’s being used in education, visit these sites:

John Orlando, PhD, is the Program Director for the online Master of Science in Business Continuity Management and Master of Science in Information Assurance programs at Norwich University. John develops faculty training in online education and is available for consulting at jorlando@norwich.edu.

Highly interactive classrooms -- from the University of Michigan

Microsoft releases free classroom interaction add-on for PowerPoint

From DSC:
Note the quote from Ira Snyder that says:

Mouse Mischief is designed to “turn students from passive observers to active participants”

Now let’s play this out a bit. If K-12’rs are starting to use more and more of these types of interactive technologies and are becoming active participants in their learning, how does that affect their expectations when they come into our colleges and universities? To me, change is not an option for those of us in higher ed. Here are my concerns if we follow the status quo:

Daniel S. Christian: My concerns with just maintaining the status quo

Adaptive learning: Putting an idea into practice at the School of One — from EducationNext.org by Paul E. Peterson

Time magazine touted “the School of One” as one of the 50 top innovations of 2009—the only educational innovation to be given that honor. As described in Time, “each day, students in the School of One are given a unique lesson plan — a ‘daily playlist’— tailored to their learning style and rate of progress that includes a mix of virtual tutoring, in-class instruction and educational video games (emphasis DSC). I stopped by a New York City middle school using the School of One last week to see how new technologies that help teachers adapt to each student’s learning level actually work in practice.

Educators, like designers, can benefit from identifying the student price point, the material the student is now ready and prepared to learn.  With adaptive testing technologies now available, schools can quickly and efficiently obtain weekly, perhaps daily, information on what a student knows. Teaching can zero in on the price point, so the student is not given something that is either too advanced or too repetitive of what he or she already knows.

School of One takes this idea one step further by also trying to identify student interests and learning styles as well.  If a boy is a Little Leaguer; then baseball statistics may be the best way to teach math.  If a girl plays volleyball, the examples can be modified accordingly.

The 21st-century art teacher — from NorthJersey.com by Stephanie Akin [via Ray’s Schroeder’s Educational Technology Blog)

From DSC:
Not saying that this is the only way to teach art — no way — but this teacher’s “…seventh- and eighth-grade art classes at Eisenhower Middle School use almost no traditional materials. Instead, he teaches students how to work with modern technology, including computers, digital cameras and camcorders. He also guides eighth-grade students through the process of producing their own daily television news program, which is broadcast to the rest of the school and on a local cable channel.”

My bet is that the energy level is high in his classes, as students are allowed to be creative in a variety of ways. If your institution doesn’t have a new media studies program, consider developing one. If you are teaching art, then you need to have at least a portion of your curriculum integrate/utilize such technologies.

  

Peg Maddocks Keys to Success presentation -- PPT slides

Campus Channel

[Recorded webinar] A teacher in your pocket: Learn how to build a 24/7 classroom that drives student engagement and achievement— from eSchoolNews.com and livescribe

asdfsdafsdaf

“Today’s classroom is filled with students who have unique learning styles and needs. Districts across the county are implementing educational technology to attempt to address this diversity and transform the educational experience, but what is the real ROI of all of this technology? How do you implement a single technology that addresses the differentiated instructional needs for your students? What is the impact of this technology on your own effectiveness and efficiency in the classroom or district office?”

40,000 Teachers Give Their Views on Education Reform in “Primary Sources” — from Scholastic and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Teachers Call For Engaging Curriculum, Supportive Leadership, Clear Standards Common Across States in Survey by Scholastic Inc. and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

New York, March 3, 2010 — Scholastic Inc. and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation today released Primary Sources: America’s Teachers on America’s Schools, a landmark report presenting the results of a national survey of more than 40,000 public school teachers in grades pre-K to 12. The survey reveals that, while teachers have high expectations for their students, they overwhelmingly agree that too many students are leaving unprepared for success beyond high school. Primary Sources reveals teachers’ thoughtful, nuanced views on issues at the heart of education reform – from performance pay and standardized tests to academic standards and teacher evaluation. Teacher responses reveal five powerful solutions to raise student achievement.

Also see:
http://www.scholastic.com/primarysources/download.asp

McGraw-Hill brings together social media & education experts to discuss the future of digital innovation in higher education

  • Geo-tagging will be a powerful tool for higher education
  • The Apple iPad will have a significant impact in the education market
  • The “smudging” of technologies: Augmented reality, mobile computing and crowdsourcing.
  • Social media can help solve the student engagement crisis.
  • In order for both students and instructors to engage in social media, there needs to be a level of incentive.

Be sure to check out their GradeGuru video/piece for:

  • An interesting new incentive system for students
  • An engaging way to relay information
  • A great illustration of the power of the web to aid in sharing educationally-related information; social learning
  • A way to find other students who have good notes

Web 2.0 in Hardcover: A recommended reading list on 2.0 and education — from Steve Hargadon and the School Library Journal (2/1/10)

Tagged with:  

From DSC:
I’ve been reflecting upon the assessment of student learning the last few days; and, in my research, I’ve seen some items that seem to point to doing things for the benefit of those administering these items. For example, I saw that one of the qualities of a good assessment is that it needs to be “easy to administer, score, and interpret”.

I understand this need to manage learning/learners/assessment, but I wonder…are we doing things for our needs and purposes of educating people?  (Other examples include: Using semesters or quarters |  50 – 90 minute class periods | This class is only available on… | We offer that course only in the… | etc.)

Could we do things any differently?Are there ways to enable student learning to be fuller? Freer? More spontaneous? At their own pace?

A related reflection here:
Recently, due to so many things being on my plate, I fell behind in a class.  As 2, 3, and then 4 days passed, I still hadn’t been able to get back to several of the assignments that I needed to get done. It weighed heavily on my mind…and it generated some anxiety within me. Then, I reflected on what it must feel like for students who don’t learn as fast or who need more time to get something — but, due to the way the system works — they don’t have the time or the liberty to take things at their own pace.

(No surprise to anyone reading this blog) Over time, this type of thing can lead to not only anxiety within learners, but can lead to depression and being “bumbed out” on education and learning in general. “This school thing…it’s not for me.” “I can’t keep up.” The belief that “I’m no good at this school thing!” — can lead to a serious waste of talents and abilities.

It is my hope that as we move through the next 10-20 years, education can be done in such a way that:

  • Enables more control of the pacing of the learning to be turned over to the students
  • Allows students to select from the media that works best for them
  • Helps students identify their true passions — STEM-related or not — and then use those passions to drive learning in other areas
© 2024 | Daniel Christian