The value of multimedia in learning — Patti Shank (2005, from Adobe’s Media Center)
The 4 C’s – Critical Skills for Success Today — from Learning Objects by Nancy Rubin
According to the recently released “AMA 2010 Critical Skills Survey,” the skills necessary for success in today’s workplace can be identified as the 4 C’s:
These skills have been determined to be crucial to workforce preparedness and business success. How do we encourage those skills in our students and our employees (professional development and personal growth)? According to the AMA survey results, 80 percent of executives believe that fusing the three R’s and four C’s would ensure that students are better prepared to enter the workforce. Proficiency in reading, writing and arithmetic is not sufficient if workers are unable to think critically, solve problems, collaborate or communicate effectively. http://www.clomedia.com/industry_news/2010/April/5186/index.php
How can an organization foster an environment where people can think critically, communicate, collaborate, and work creatively? Andrew McAfee wrote this week about the importance of implementing Social Software Platforms; even going so far as to suggest skipping a pilot. McAfee’s rollout plan for Enterprise 2.0 adoption encourages collaboration and communication in the organization. His six steps for deploying Enterprise 2.0 included…
“The Learning Score is a new and imaginative take on lesson-planning. Using the metaphor of a music score, Learning Score shows the planned activities for a lesson, and any multimedia attachments, as a graphical time line. Whole lesson plans can be saved, along with all the embedded resources and annotations, to be used again at a later date, or to be shared with colleagues. The Learning Score was invented by John Davitt and grew out of a desire to provide teachers and learners with a modern, flexible, technology-friendly and pedagogically rigorous approach to lesson-planning that is suitable for the 21st-century classroom.”
The changing role of instructors — moving from facilitation to constructive partnerships — from The Journal by Ruth Reynard
However, as we transition from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 (and, more specifically, the modifications and new technology features and functions made possible by HTML5), it seems that we will be experiencing yet another change in our instructional role. The challenge is now to retain certain aspects of facilitation but move actively into the learning process itself and become partners in the process. As the “field” levels even further, we must understand and embrace the meaning and the implications of being constructive partners in the learning process.
…
Learning as a Process–not a Product
As I have written in several articles, we are already being stretched as educators to focus more on the process of learning rather than the product. This will increasingly become the focus as real-time networks and learning communities will be constantly engaged in process. The product or the result of those collaborations will be different each time, although still within the knowledge area of a course, but based on those who have participated in the process and how ideas have been used. Therefore, the true evaluation of learning will be how knowledge has been expanded and applied rather than preset information bites. This is a challenge to the mindset of the instructor and to the overall structures of courses and programs of study. The potential of the Internet for user customization will increase with emerging technology and will have a large impact on how education is both organized and delivered. Instructors will also become more aware of their own learning process and integrate that more intentionally in the collaborative learning process of a community of learners.
Once again, then, the role of instructors is being challenged and redefined. It is important to emphasize that this is not a passive experience for instructors in the sense that we should simply wait and see what happens and where we will be in terms of student expectations. It is, actually, a highly active experience and a call for educators to begin now to engage with changes in technology and explore the implications for teaching methods as we move forward.
As never before, educators must be front and center of the emergence of newer technology and already explore the capabilities to improve the learning experience for students and instructors alike. We must truly engage with the process at every level.
Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy
Facilitator: Dr. Terry Anderson
Institution: Athabasca University
Date and time: Apr 14, 2010 11:00 AM
In this presentation Terry defines three pedagogical models that have defined distance education programming – behavioural/cognitive, constructivist and connectivist. He talks about the challenges and opportunity afforded by each model, with a focus on the emergent development of connectivism.
Innovative ways to engage learners with cell phones using research-based strategies — from the Innovative Educator
More on reflective journals — from Learning Objects by Nancy Rubin
Reflective ‘writing’ is a series of ‘writings’ in response to experiences & events that may also contains reflections on what took place, express emotions, understandings & conclusions, lessons learned or action plans. Often called a “Journal Entry”. You don’t have to be a great writer, perfect speller, or creative thinker to keep a personal journal. Just regularly write down your experiences and thoughts. Here is a great video by Keuka College on the effectiveness of reflecting.
Click here to download an Academic Tip Sheet on Blogs and Journals (PDF) from Edith Cowan University.
Some Journal Prompts:
The benefits of blended learning — from Faculty Focus
Blended learning, which combines face-to-face learning with a mixture of online activities, has been hailed as both a cost-effective way to relieve overcrowded classroom and a convenient alternative to the traditional classroom experience. But it has quickly become much more than that.
“There’s a growing body of evidence that suggests blended courses really are an effective way for students to learn,” says Ike Shibley, PhD, associate professor of chemistry at Penn State-Berks. “Blended courses can actually lead to increased student engagement, not less (emphasis DSC).”
But for blended learning to work well for you and, more importantly, your students, it requires a fair amount of upfront prep time in advance of the course and the discipline to stick to your course plan. More so than in traditional face-to-face courses, Shibley says.