Also see:
- Would you trust a lawyer bot with your legal needs? — from the wsj.com
Artificial intelligence can help write small-claims court filings, leases and more, but some law professors urge caution
On 07/15/2020,
in 21st century, change, collaboration, policy, political science, society, sociology, technology (general), web-based collaboration,
by Daniel Christian
What a Black tech movement might look like — from venturebeat.com by Khari Johnson
Excerpt:
That’s why, Wilson told VentureBeat, she is launching the National Black Tech Ecosystem Association. The group’s initial community gathering will focus on bringing together people in tech and the Black faith community.
“My ultimate vision is to build an association that allows for all of those entities to share information, to collectively organize, develop policy, and if needed protest moments around this new tech world that’s being built,” she told VentureBeat.
On 07/13/2020,
in Access to Justice (A2J), Cost of legal services - including access, Legal operations, legal reform, legal technologies, legislatures / government / legal, parents/guardians, policy, political science, society, trends, Uncategorized, United States,
by Daniel Christian
Renters, homeowners face new phase of coronavirus crisis with evictions, foreclosures looming — from finance.yahoo.com by Alexis Keenan
Excerpt:
A potential housing crisis is on the way for millions of Americans whose mortgage and rent deferrals are about to sunset.
Evictions loom as the end of state and local moratoriums will no longer protect homeowners and tenants unable to make payments because of COVID-19 lockdowns. A minority of U.S. states have already expired orders against evictions, and a host of others across the country are set to expire over the next two months.
Once they do, residents are facing a possible flood of non-payment legal actions. The COVID-19 Eviction Defense Project (CEDP) predicted recently that by the end of September, more than 20 million U.S. renters —many of them Black and Latino located in big cities — will be at risk for eviction.
On 06/04/2020,
in 21st century, 24x7x365 access, Asia, data related items, emerging technologies, ethics, Europe, future, internet, leadership, legislatures / government / legal, machine-to-machine communications, morals/values, policy, political science, society, the downsides of how people use tech, tools, trends, United States, vendors,
by Daniel Christian
From DSC:
I can’t help but reflect on how slippery the slope is when we start talking about using drones — especially as sponsored and used by governments, including our government here in the U.S. Consider the following from The Future Institute.
Excerpt:
Eyes in the sky
As nationwide racial justice protests continue, some journalists and protestors have noticed a new addition to the armed police officers and National Guard troops: a drone flying a hexagon-shaped route 20,000 feet above the streets in Minneapolis. The drone, flown by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, is called a Predator, and is a piece of military technology used for identifying and targeting terrorists overseas. Lately, it’s become a more common sight domestically.
Last month, a number of New Yorkers witnessed a drone floating above them, barking orders to follow social distancing guidelines. The mysterious drone wasn’t official police equipment, but rather a privately owned device piloted by a man named Xavier Arthur in Queens, who was frustrated that people weren’t following stay-at-home orders. He claimed to represent the “Anti-Covid-19 Volunteer Drone Task Force.
It’s not an isolated incident. During the outbreak, drones have been used extensively to monitor residents and encourage them to stay indoors, to inspect traffic stops and hospitals, and to spray cities with disinfectants. In Paris and Mumbai, they’re patrolling social distancing violators. In China, a video clip went viral, showing a drone breaking up a mahjong game—residents had defied local orders that they stay indoors. Drones with infrared cameras also allegedly flew overhead and checked for people with fevers.
Advanced drones can pinpoint certain behaviors in crowds from high altitudes, recognize and automatically follow targets, and communicate with each other or to command centers on the ground with remarkable precision and low latency. The pandemic and protests are playing to the strengths of an emerging real-time aerial surveillance ecosystem.
3 Things You Should Know
- The Flying Internet of Things is taking off.
- New drones can self-destruct.
- Shareable drones may drive growth in the industry.
On 05/19/2020,
in 21st century, Access to Justice (A2J), ideas, law schools, leadership, legal reform, legal technologies, legislatures / government / legal, pace of change, policy, political science, workplace,
by Daniel Christian
![ABA President Judy Perry Martinez on the ABA and the Profession in a Pandemic [Ambrogi]](http://danielschristian.com/learning-ecosystems/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/LawSites-5-18-20-Ambrogi-Martinez.jpg)
ABA President Judy Perry Martinez on the ABA and the Profession in a Pandemic — from lawsitesblog.com by Robert Ambrogi
Excerpt:
We talked about how she and the ABA have responded to the pandemic, including with her appointment of the Task Force on Legal Needs Arising Out of the 2020 Pandemic and, just last week, the Coordinating Group on Practice Forward. We also discussed her thoughts on the pandemic’s impacts on the profession, the justice system, and access to justice.
On 04/21/2020,
in 21st century, Access to Justice (A2J), career development, change, changing business models, cloud-based computing / apps / other cloud-related, collaboration, communities of practice, competency-based learning/education, corporate / business world, Cost of legal services - including access, experimentation, law schools, leadership, Legal operations, legal reform, legal technologies, legislatures / government / legal, new business models, online learning, podcasting, political science, presentations, productivity / tips and tricks, professional development, society, technology (general), telelegal, tools, vision/possibilities,
by Daniel Christian
Jennifer Leonard, Jordan Long, and Cat Moon
Part I — 4/10/20
This episode is the first of two episodes that discuss the future of the profession in the wake of the COVID19 crisis. Guests Jordan Furlong and Cat Moon discuss:
- How COVID 19 exposes the access to justice crisis the profession has created
- Why the crisis offers the opportunity to leverage technology in new ways
- Why the structures and systems that have defined the profession have been so durable
- Whether lawyers view the crisis as a blip or a transformation
- How leaders can pivot toward innovation
From DSC:
At several points in the conversation, when Cat and Jordan were both referring to the importance of experimentation within the legal realm, I was reminded of this graphic that I did back in 2013:
I was reminded of it as well because Jennifer Leonard rightly (in my perspective), brought in higher education into the discussion at several points. There are some similarities — especially concerning power and privilege. Well, it’s now true in the legal realm as well (and probably has been true for a while…I’m just behind).
Experimentation. Experimentation. Experimentation. <– so key in the legal realm right now!
Other notes I took:
- Triage: Need to deal with essentials to keep afloat. Yourself, staff, clients, cash flow. Put out the fire.
- Reconstruction: In parallel, create “field hospitals.” Recession is going to have massive impacts on old systems. Need new systems. Start building institutions that work. Build as many of these as you can. Experiments. House isn’t going to be inhabitable after the fire. Need a new shelter — maybe start w/ a tent, then a cabin, then a house. Build on something small. Start building what’s going to replace the old systems.
- Power and privilege imbalance is why people haven’t been able to change things. “I can make you do something for me. You come here so I can dispense justice to you.” But not just judges…throughout the system.
- Public legal awareness and legal education. In high schools, universities, colleges, churches, mosques, synagogues, etc.
- Higher ed and legal services? Anything we can learn from each other?
- Systems created by people who rule the systems. Power imbalance exists in higher ed, but hubris is completely indefensible within the legal realm. Need much better access to legal information and legal understanding.
- OS on the Mac. Don’t have another OS for legal system to move to. We need to redesign our legal OS to serve more people.
- Law is society’s OS. Law is DOS-based…need Windows or Mac type of leap.
- Self protectionism. Hubris. Power imbalance. Power hungry.
- Yet many who enter legal profession come in wanting to make the world a better place. Why the move away from these ideals? Need more focus on developing professional identity. Structure, framework for how to be a lawyer. Students become more cynical as time goes by. Also, there’s “ladder pulling.” Pay your dues. Get hazed. I had to do it…now you have to do it. Bar Exam good example of this. Confirmation bias. It’s the way we’ve always done it.
Today, the following things ARE happening — so it CAN be done! The people in charge just didn’ want to do these things.
- lawyers working from home
- e-filing of documents to courts
- video hearings in court
- faster, cheaper, more convenient
Jennifer Leonard, Jordan Long, and Cat Moon
Part II – 4/14/20
On this second part of a two-part series, Professor Cat Moon and Jordan Furlong discuss COVID 19’s impact on legal education and law firms. The conversation explores:
- The “knock out effect” the crisis has on the various parts of the lawyer formation system
- Who might take ownership of coordinating the new landscape of lawyer accreditation
- The opportunities lifelong learning creates for law schools to be involved in the ongoing development of legal professionals
- How human-centered design and project-based learning offer ways to integrate the three sides of the Delta model of lawyer competency
- How small and solo law firms might be impacted by the crisis
Notes I took:
- The knock-out effect.
- How can we coordinate amongst the players in the system? Will be hard, because of the existing fiefdoms. Power and authority move back up the chain to those who did the delegating in the first place. If the power has been delegated to you, you are at a disadvantage. Jordan sees an assertion of authority from a central entity — legislatures most likely; possibly courts.
- This moment offers us an opportunity to experiment and to redesign our systems. Can find new ways to fulfill missions.
- Have no choice but to embrace the ambiguity of the moment.
- Triage, then try to build something better than what we had before.
- We have to build something different. “And look, the sky’s not falling!” Think big. Act boldly in these experiments. Expand what we think is possible.
- The repercussions of the Coronavirus will be with us for much longer than many think it will
- Legal principles/concepts/rules. Areas of practice. Professional formation (ethics, integrity, operational aspects, & more). Know the law, but also WHY we have the law and lawyers.
- Can learn “black letter law” asynchronously and via videoconferencing.
- Need to expand curriculum: Project/time management, customer service, financial and tech literacy
- Delta Model — a framework for developing lawyer competencies; starts in law schools; what are the skills and competencies; the foundation is the practice of law; research, issue spotting, PM, data analysis, understanding business; understanding people; wholistic approach. A lifelong journey of growth.
- Law schools — 3 years, then done. Not a productive way to do things. We need to keep people on top of their game throughout a career. Is legal education a place or a system/process that you enter and re-enter again and again throughout one’s career? Wouldn’t it be great if I could access ___ modules along the way?
- How are we going to create/design highly engaging online-based learning experiences? #1 on Cat’s priority list now. Got moved up the priority list.
- There are pros and cons for both F2F and online-based learning. Humanizing impact when your professors are teaching from their homes.
- Reframing legal education just as we are reframing courts as a service, not a place.
- Blended approach can be very effective/powerful.
- Need to collect data on what’s working and what’s not working.
- Fundamental business model of corporate side is likely at the end of its course; law firms will need a new model for generating profit. For smaller firms, prospects are more dire as their clients are going through major negative changes. Potential unsustainability of many practices.
- How can we provide different models that expand access to justice? That help develop happier and healthier lawyers?
- Per legalproblemsolving.org, human-centered design is:
- …a fluid framework for discovering problems, ideating solutions, and iterating to continuously improve solutions. HCD provides a methodology for considering both legal service delivery challenges, as well as clients’ legal problems. The HCD method also serves as a tool individual law students can use to craft a rewarding, successful legal career.
On 04/17/2020,
in 21st century, 24x7x365 access, Access to Justice (A2J), change, changing business models, future, game-changing environment, ideas, innovation, law schools, legal reform, legal technologies, legislatures / government / legal, new business models, policy, political science, society,
by Daniel Christian
LawNext Episode 71: Legal Futurist Richard Susskind on Coronavirus, Courts and the Legal Profession — from .lawsitesblog.com by Robert Ambrogi
Excerpt:
Ever since the publication of his seminal 1996 book, The Future of Law, Richard Susskind has remained the world’s most-recognized and most-respected speaker and author on the future of legal services. But even he could not have foreseen the sudden relevance of his latest book, Online Courts and the Future of Justice.
On this episode of LawNext, Susskind joins host Bob Ambrogi for a conversation about the legal profession and the judicial system in a time of global pandemic. Will the pandemic fast-forward law’s leap into the future? Will there be fundamental change in legal services delivery? Will courts move online more quickly than even he had thought? Susskind shares his thoughts on these questions and more.
Also see:
On 04/11/2020,
in 21st century, Access to Justice (A2J), Canada, Cost of legal services - including access, law schools, legal reform, legal technologies, legislatures / government / legal, platforms, policy, political science, productivity / tips and tricks, society, United States,
by Daniel Christian
Pandemic II: Justice system down — from law21.ca by Jordan Furlong
Excerpt:
We need to recognize a couple of things about our justice system, in order to fully appreciate the fate that awaits it in the COVID-19 era and the tasks that now lie in front of us.
The first is that the system has nowhere near the capacity or resilience required to handle an emergency of this magnitude. Like our hospitals, which are about to be overrun with virus patients, our courts are perpetually underfunded, technologically handicapped, and already overloaded.
Case backlogs are common, hearings are routinely adjourned, and even straightforward cases stretch out over months and years. There is an entire body of constitutional law that addresses how long you can delay a person’s trial before their rights are violated, and it should tell us something that we don’t even find that remarkable anymore.
What this crisis has revealed is the central operating assumption of our justice institutions, which has now become our stumbling block: Everybody comes to the courthouse.
…
Richard Susskind has made many insightful observations over the course of his career, but I suspect one will outlast all the others: “We have to decide if court is a place or a service.” For hundreds of years — right up until last month, in fact — court has been a place. By the time this pandemic has truly run its course, court will be a service.
On 03/15/2020,
in law schools, legal reform, legislatures / government / legal, policy, political science, society, United States,
by Daniel Christian
US falls out of top 20 in Rule of Law Index, while global declines continue — from abajournal.com by Debra Cassens Weiss
Excerpt:
For the first time, the United States fell out of the top 20 countries for adherence to the rule of law in an index compiled by the World Justice Project.
The United States dropped to No. 21 in the index, while Spain moved in to the top 20, according to press releases here and here and a summary here. The index is based on national surveys of more than 130,000 households and 4,000 legal practitioners and experts around the world.