{"id":77925,"date":"2021-12-21T15:23:48","date_gmt":"2021-12-21T20:23:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/?p=77925"},"modified":"2021-12-21T15:49:32","modified_gmt":"2021-12-21T20:49:32","slug":"asdfadsfdsaf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/2021\/12\/21\/asdfadsfdsaf\/","title":{"rendered":"Three items re: California\u2019s Access-To-Justice (#A2J) Crisis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/iaals.du.edu\/blog\/california-lawmakers-ignore-data-calls-restrict-expansion-legal-services\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>California Lawmakers Ignore Data in Calls to Restrict the Expansion of Legal Services<\/strong> <\/a>&#8212; from iaals.du.edu<\/p>\n<p><em>Excerpt:<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Earlier this week, two California lawmakers spoke up about these issues. Cheryl Miller, writing for Law.com\u2019s The Recorder, reports: \u201cThe chairs of California\u2019s two legislative judiciary committees this week accused the state bar of \u2018divert[ing] its attention from its core mission of protecting the public\u2019 by pursuing proposals to allow nonlawyers to offer a limited range of legal services.\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">California Supreme Court Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye called the criticism \u201cnot surprising,\u201d and we would agree. After all, it is the same message we\u2019ve heard time and again from opponents to any real, impactful change within the legal profession. And the assumptions underlying that message have been discredited by our organization and many other scholars, researchers, and even regulators in other countries. So it is frustrating just how widespread and misleading opponent claims can be.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">In response to CA Judiciary letter&#8217;s concern about encouraging legal innovation, Professor David Engstrom, CLP&#8217;s Lucy Ricca, former LSC President Jim Sandman, Prof. Rebecca Sandefur and others: The A2J crisis is &#8220;too urgent to put on the back burner.&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Uzo6lej0ti\">https:\/\/t.co\/Uzo6lej0ti<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 SLS Legal Profession (@StanfordCLP) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/StanfordCLP\/status\/1471991932821794818?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 17, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Professor <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DavidEngstrom5?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@DavidEngstrom5<\/a>, co-director of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/StanfordCLP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@StanfordCLP<\/a>, discusses the urgent access-to-justice crisis currently gripping CA and the CA State Bar\u2019s Closing the Justice Gap working group. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/zpbPlwBIhO\">https:\/\/t.co\/zpbPlwBIhO<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/StanfordLaw\/status\/1471980037893201922?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">December 17, 2021<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>California Lawmakers Ignore Data in Calls to Restrict the Expansion of Legal Services &#8212; from iaals.du.edu Excerpt: Earlier this week, two California lawmakers spoke up about these issues. Cheryl Miller, writing for Law.com\u2019s The Recorder, reports: \u201cThe chairs of California\u2019s two legislative judiciary committees this week accused the state bar of \u2018divert[ing] its attention from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[113,832,837,833,285,201,321],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21st-century","category-access-to-justice","category-legal-operations","category-legal-reform","category-legislation-legislatures","category-policy","category-united-states"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77925"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77925\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77939,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77925\/revisions\/77939"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}