{"id":4028,"date":"2010-04-22T08:47:19","date_gmt":"2010-04-22T12:47:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/?p=4028"},"modified":"2010-04-22T08:47:19","modified_gmt":"2010-04-22T12:47:19","slug":"the-changing-role-of-instructors-ruth-reynard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/2010\/04\/22\/the-changing-role-of-instructors-ruth-reynard\/","title":{"rendered":"The changing role of instructors &#8212; Ruth Reynard"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"ctl00_pContentPlaceHolder_ctl03_MainHeading\"><a href=\"http:\/\/thejournal.com\/Articles\/2010\/04\/07\/The-Changing-Role-of-Instructors-Moving-from-Facilitation-to-Constructive-Partnerships.aspx?\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>The  changing role of instructors &#8212; moving from facilitation to constructive  partnerships<\/strong><\/a> &#8212; from The Journal by Ruth Reynard<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">However, as we transition from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 (and, more  specifically, the modifications and new technology features and  functions made possible by HTML5), it seems that we will be experiencing  yet another change in our instructional role. The challenge is now to  retain certain aspects of facilitation but move actively into the  learning process itself and become partners in the process. As the  &#8220;field&#8221; levels even further, we must understand and embrace the meaning  and the implications of being constructive partners in the learning  process.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Learning as a Process&#8211;not a Product<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\nAs I have written  in several articles, we are already being  stretched as educators to focus more on the process of learning rather  than the product. This will increasingly become the focus as real-time  networks and learning communities will be constantly engaged in process.  The product or the result of those collaborations will be different  each time, although still within the knowledge area of a course, but  based on those who have participated in the process and how ideas have  been used. Therefore, the true evaluation of learning will be how  knowledge has been expanded and applied rather than preset information  bites. This is a challenge to the mindset of the instructor and to the  overall structures of courses and programs of study. The potential of  the Internet for user customization will increase with emerging  technology and will have a large impact on how education is both  organized and delivered. Instructors will also become more aware of  their own learning process and integrate that more intentionally in the  collaborative learning process of a community of learners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Once again, then, the role of instructors is being challenged and  redefined. It is important to emphasize that this is not a passive  experience for instructors in the sense that we should simply wait and  see what happens and where we will be in terms of student expectations.  It is, actually, a highly active experience and a call for educators to  begin now to engage with changes in technology and explore the  implications for teaching methods as we move forward.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">As never before, educators must be front and center of the emergence  of newer technology and already explore the capabilities to improve the  learning experience for students and instructors alike. We must truly  engage with the process at every level.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The changing role of instructors &#8212; moving from facilitation to constructive partnerships &#8212; from The Journal by Ruth Reynard However, as we transition from Web 2.0 to Web 3.0 (and, more specifically, the modifications and new technology features and functions made possible by HTML5), it seems that we will be experiencing yet another change in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,35,173,50],"tags":[56,585,658,594],"class_list":["post-4028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education-technology","category-game-changing-environment","category-pedagogy","category-teaching-learning","tag-educational-technology","tag-game-changing-environment","tag-pedagogy","tag-teaching-learning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4028"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4029,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4028\/revisions\/4029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/danielschristian.com\/learning-ecosystems\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}