Psalm 143:8 New International Version (NIV) — from biblegateway.com

Let the morning bring me word of your unfailing love,
for I have put my trust in you.
Show me the way I should go,
for to you I entrust my life.

 

EMLYON Business School to create a ‘Smart Business School’ via IBM Cloud — from finance.yahoo.com
New digital learning environment based on the SoftLayer infrastructure will personalize education experience globally

Excerpt:

ECULLY, France, Jan. 27, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — IBM (NYSE: IBM) and EMLYON today announced a program to develop a ‘Smart Business School’ higher education environment that is capable of delivering personalized, on-demand business education on a global basis via the IBM Cloud. EMLYON will work with IBM to place educational innovation and digital entrepreneurship at the heart of its strategy, to create better outcomes for its students and a more engaging environment for its teachers.

The changes in the world of education given rising globalization forces, new uses related to digital content  and higher expectations of learners and teachers is putting a pressure on higher education. In response, EMLYON turned to IBM to transform the current ways in which their students are acquiring knowledge and skills to be better prepared for the world outside the classroom.

“What we believe is genuinely new about this initiative is that it will allow us to deliver content and coaching that are absolutely relevant to each participants’ needs and aspirations, wherever they are in the world and at every step on their career path,” said Bernard Belletante, dean of EMLYON. “So, in a similar way that users today can cherry-pick their entertainment, our community will be able to choose when, where and how much it learns.”

 

From DSC, a somewhat related comment to the above item…
Even if and when technologies such as IBM’s Watson, Apple’s Siri, Google’s Deepmind, or Amazon’s Echo get baked into MOOCs and/or other forms of online or blended learning, teachers/professors/trainers will still be critically important. They always have been and likely always will be.  However, the heavy lifting of learning a subject may be able to be done with such tools and technologies. Learners will then come to the Subject Matter Experts (SME’s) with their questions and requests for further guidance.

Along these lines, a somewhat-related graphic from a while back:

 

Watson-MOOCs-NewTypesCollaboration-DChristian-2-14-13

 

 

 

 

Outlook: Future of work in 2015 — from research.gigaom.com by Stowe Boyd; with thanks to Norma Owen for this resource

Excerpt:

With the likes of BYOD and collaboration tools now commonplace and expected, the enterprise turns its attention towards technologies and processes that will make day-to-day tasks more personalized, enhance employee engagement, and ultimately alter the overall culture of the workplace.

Among the trends we expect to surface or continue gaining ground in 2015 are:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI). Next year will be a turning point for AI and algorithms for business thanks to the rapid maturation of those technologies. Social-network analysis will become the norm as companies continue to seek strategic insight from business intelligence (BI) and data analytics.
  • Mobility continues its growth towards highly personal devices and practices like wearables and work chat, both of which put more control in the hands of the user/employee.
  • The heightened awareness of costs associated with a disengaged workforce have led to the rise of a new class of software: culture-management tools. RoundPegg, CultureIQ, Waggl, and TINYpulse, among many others, are designed to keep track of employee sentiment, find problems that might affect morale or retention, and help drive initiatives to keep engagement high.

 

 

3 workplace trends to watch for in 2015 (and beyond) — from fortune.com by Anne Fisher
Artificial intelligence will rock the job market, your company will need a Chief of Work, and cubicle farms will disappear.

 

 

162 future jobs: Preparing for jobs that don’t yet exist — from http://www.futuristspeaker.com by Thomas Frey

Note from DSC:  I don’t agree with some of these future jobs/directions, but Thomas’ point is for this posting to be a “thought-generator, an idea-sparker, to help you draw your own conclusions.”

Excerpt:

14 Hot New Skills

  1. Transitionists – Those who can help make a transition.
  2. Expansionists – A talent for adapting along with a growing environment.
  3. Maximizers – An ability to maximize processes, situations, and opportunities.
  4. Optimizers – The skill and persistence to tweak variables until it produces better results.
  5. Inflectionists – Finding critical inflection points in a system will become a much-prized skill.
  6. Dismantlers – Every industry will eventually end, and this requires talented people who know how to scale things back in an orderly fashion.
  7. Feedback Loopers – Those who can devise the best possible feedback loops.
  8. Backlashers – Ever- new technology will have its detractors, and each backlash will require a response.
  9. Last Milers – Technologies commonly reach a point of diminishing returns as they attempt to extend their full capacity to the end user. People with the ability to mastermind these solutions will be in hot demand.
  10. Contexualists – In between the application and the big picture lays the operational context for every new technology.
  11. Ethicists – There will be an ever-growing demand for people who can ask the tough question and standards to apply moral decency to some increasingly complex situations.
  12. Philosophers – With companies in a constant battle over “my-brain-is-bigger-that-your-brain,” it becomes the overarching philosophy that wins the day.
  13. Theorists – Every new product, service, and industry begins with a theory.
  14. Legacists – Those who are passionate and skilled with leaving a legacy.

 

 

 

Navigating-An-Uncertain-Future-Salvatico

 

 

 

————————————
Addendum on 2/3/15:
————————————

3 predictions for the future of jobs — from agenda.weforum.org by Kristel Van der Elst and Trudi Lang

Excerpt:

As participants at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos contemplate the “new global context”, the emerging global shifts identified by the Global Strategic Foresight Community (GFSC) can be referenced to provide fresh perspectives on the future of jobs.

In current narratives on the coming era of employment, we often come across fears of a future in which permanent jobs will fade away and machines increasingly perform cognitive jobs in place of people, forcing automation and, as a result, unemployment across the employment spectrum – including high-skilled and white-collar labour. Such scenarios are highlighted by several GSFC members (Francisco Sagasti, Claudia Juech, Jill Wong, Nouriel Roubini).

However, there are other narratives relating to the future of jobs suggested by the members:

Global Strategic Foresight Community – Members’ Perspectives on Global Shifts

Excerpt:

As an extension of its own Strategic Foresight practice, the World Economic Forum has established a new community initiative, the Global Strategic Foresight Community (GSFC). A diverse, multistakeholder group, it brings together eminent and forward-looking thought leaders and senior practitioners from leading public, private and civil society organizations. The purpose of the Global Strategic Foresight Community is to provide a peer network to compare and contrast insights as well as to positively shape future-related industry, regional and global agendas. Below you will find information about the members as well as their foresight perspectives on “global shifts”. These shifts concern topics or issues which GSFC members believe should be highlighted now and added to the agendas of the Forum and relevant organizations to inspire constructive action for the future.

 

[From DSC: In the posting below, when I say higher ed, I’m thinking here of traditional 4-year colleges and universities, whether for-profit or non-profit.]



Years ago…President Obama said to higher ed: “You’re getting too expensive. Please take steps to address this, will you?” And student debt continued to mount that year. Many families struggled with how to make getting degrees work within their budgets.

But the year passed, higher ed did little to nothing to address the issue of accessibility and pricing, so President Obama had to once again address higher ed: “Heh…did you all hear me, I said that you’re getting too expensive. Please take steps to address this, will you?”

Higher ed responded, “Yeh, yeh, yeh…we know…we’ve heard you say this before. Thanks…and have a nice day.” And what was unsaid — yet what was lived out — was “Let us run our own show. Please don’t bother us again.”

So another year passed, higher ed again did little to nothing to address the issue of accessibility and the rising cost of attending college. Therefore, even more families and students went into debt (an invisible reality that folks on campus often don’t really “see” being played out in real peoples’ lives). The amount of student debt continued to increase on a national level. At this point, more students and families started to question whether they wanted to go into that kind of debt — would they be ok with the decision to delay the start of their families? Would they be ok with not being able to purchase a home for a while after graduating? Or not being able to save for their retirements for a long while? (Re: this last item, financial advisers often stress how important time is — advising folks to put away money early on in their lives so that time and compound interest can be on their side, working positively on their investments.) So families and individuals begin to ask, “Is college really worth it?” (And I believe it is in most situations today, but that’s not the point of this posting.)

Yet again, higher ed doesn’t respond much…at least not for the most part. While a handful of experiments begin here and there, most of the traditional institutions of higher education pursue the status quo…all the while believing, “The gold ol’ days will return. The period we’re going through is an aberration. Let the status quo continue — it’s working very well for us.” But it wasn’t — and isn’t — an aberration. Student debt continued to mount. More families and students found higher education now out of reach for them.

Meanwhile, higher ed institutions said things like, “Our tuition increases were the smallest within our peer group” or “Our tuition increases were the smallest in years” or “We didn’t increase tuition nearly as much as the other institutions in our state.”

So fast forward and once again, President Obama had to address higher ed: “Heh!!! You’re too expensive! Are you guys hearing me or what?! If you don’t take steps to address this, the Federal Government’s going to get involved. Got it?!”

Then higher ed essentially responded in the same manner, “Yeh, yeh, yeh…we know…we’ve heard you say this before. Thanks…and, again, have a nice day.”

And so it went for the last several years.

Therefore, does anyone blame the President for taking matters to the next level? If traditional 4-year colleges and universities aren’t going to do much to address the accessibility/cost situation, then he and the Federal Government have to get seriously involved.

 

For others, a federal government that spends more than $140 billion a year on higher education is justified in attempting to get the right bang for its buck.

— from Ry Rivard’s article, New Higher Ed Federalism, at insidehighered.com on 1/12/15

 

So on January 8th, 2015, President Obama introduced his proposal for free community college for responsible students across the nation who are willing to work hard (see here , here, here, here, or here).

If this moves forward, it could have an enormous impact on those traditional 4-year colleges and universities who blew him off all of those years.

 

January 8, 2015

 

.

Also see:

  • ‘Nontraditional’ but increasingly common barriers to higher education –from huffingtonpost.com by Abby Miller
    Excerpt:
    At the heart of this country’s vast income inequality — an issue which has at last been gaining the urgent attention it deserves — is a growing educational divide. A college degree is the ticket to employment and better quality of life, yet it is more than ever unattainable for those who need it most: the growing number of low-income, first-generation college-going, adult, and immigrant populations; college students who until recently were referred to as “nontraditional”.
 

McKinsey: Business needs to deal with youth unemployment — from cnbc.com by Lawrence Delevingne

Excerpt (emphasis DSC):

One of the world’s elite management consultants said businesses should pay attention to lagging youth employment.

“One of the biggest issues we think that we are facing in our times is the issue about youth unemployment,” Dominic Barton, global managing director of McKinsey & Co., said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Thursday.

“It’s something that business needs to be worried about. It’s not something that’s a side show,” Barton added. “If we don’t deal with it we’re not going to be able to operate in the way we need to. We need to own it more.”

Dangote said that some modes of education were outdated, and graduates have seen their jobs supplanted by advances in technology. The solution, he said, is to increase vocational and technical training and entrepreneurship.

Barton agreed that more training was important, especially short term programs.

 

From DSC:
A few thoughts on this one:

  1. I was glad to see this call out to business to get more involved with helping equip our youth — a WIN-WIN situation for sure.
    .
  2. Speaking of WIN-WIN situations…are there mutually-beneficial opportunities for business and higher ed here? (i.e., higher ed collaborating more aggressively with the corporate world in order to provide more of these short term programs?) I wonder if the need for these short term solutions is one of the reasons why we’re seeing more bootcamps and similar alternatives popping up?
    .
  3. Those in the corporate/business world need to be more involved with — and pulse-checking trends involving — higher education. While those in higher education need to be more involved with — and pulse-checking trends involving — K-12.  As it is, we’re seeing gaps in the continuum on a number of different levels. Quoting from the McKinsey piece above, “Most people don’t know what jobs are available, and if they do, they’re out of date in terms of where they are,” Barton said. “There are big mismatches that are going on.”

 

 

 

Steelcase names winning design for “Classroom of the Future” —  from interiordesign.net by Matthew Powell

Excerpt:

Who better to turn a laser-sharp eye on the constant evolution of learning spaces than the design industry’s forward-thinking students? Seeking to push the boundaries of educational design, Steelcase Education and Steelcase Design Alliances launched its NEXT Student Design Competition last year, turning to undergraduate juniors and seniors at schools with Council for Interior Design Accreditation for proposals. Selected from over 800 submissions, Emma Montgomery of Kansas State University took the grand prize at a ceremony held in Steelcase’s headquarters in Grand Rapids, Michigan for her proposal that would increase student engagement and retention.

.

 Next-student-design-competition-steelcase-02

 

 

Exclusive: Facebook hiring spree hints at ambitions in virtual reality and beyond — from reuters.com by Alexei Oreskovic & Bill Riby

Excerpt:

(Reuters) – Virtual reality goggles, drones and data centers are all driving a hiring spree at Facebook Inc (FB.O) that is set to swell its ranks as much as 14 percent in the near term, according to a review of job listings on the company’s website.

The Internet social networking company aims to add nearly 1,200 new employees, the outgrowth of aggressive investments that executives have said will define the coming year.

Oculus Rift, the maker of virtual reality headsets that Facebook acquired in a $2 billion deal last year, is among the key areas slated for growth, with 54 jobs listed on its website, according to a review by Reuters of listings.

 

 

Also see:

 

Addendums on 1/22/15 and 1/23/15:

 

IBM Awards University of Texas at Austin Top Spot in Watson Competition — from indiaeducationdiary.in

Excerpts/applications (emphasis and numbering via DSC):

New York: IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced the first winner of its Watson University Competition, part of the company’s partnership with top universities through its cognitive computing academic initiative. The winning team of student entrepreneurs from the University of Texas at Austin will receive $100,000 in total in seed funding to help launch a business based on their Watson app, which offers the promise of improved citizen services.

The University of Texas at Austin took home top honors with a new app called 1) CallScout, designed to give Texas residents fast and easy access to information about social services in their area. Many of Texas’ 27 million residents rely on the state’s social services – such as transportation, healthcare, nutrition programs and housing assistance – though they can have difficulty finding the right information.

“These academic competitions expose students to a new era of computing, helps them build valuable professional skills, and provides an opportunity for young entrepreneurs to bring their ideas to life.”


Two other innovative projects rounded out the top three finalists in the competition. Students from the University of Toronto took second place with 2) “Ross,” an app that allows users to ask Watson legal questions related to their case work, speeding research and guiding lawyers to pertinent information to help their case. In third place, students from the University of California, Berkeley, designed a new app called 3) “Patent Fox” that conceptualizes patent ideas, simplifies queries, streamlines filing processes and provides confidence-ranked, evidence-based results.

“Through this program we have been able to create a unique experience that not only enabled our students to develop skills in cognitive computing, app development and team work, but also in business development.”
 

Stanford2025-AsOfJan2015

.

 

 

NYC students spark innovative ideas to improve higher education, city services using IBM Watson
CUNY and IBM announce winners in Student App Competition

3rd place –Education: Advyzr
A mobile app that would advise undergraduates and college counselors on ideal courses and schedules based on learning preferences, graduation requirements, majors, and career goals. It would seamlessly integrate academic targets and user preferences.

Also see:

Student teams to present final ideas — from baruch.cuny.edu
For CUNY-IBM Watson Case Competition | Watch Videos to Learn More About the Teams and Their Ideas

 

 

 

What if students made a school? — from nextgenlearning.org by Tom Carroll

Excerpts:

What would happen if we trusted students to design their schools? Student voice and choice are core principles of a personalized learning movement that is empowering today’s youth to take responsibility for the knowledge, skills and abilities they need to thrive in college, careers and life.

As new education models grow to support this movement, are we ready to take the next step: asking students to help us customize the staff, space, curriculum, tools, and time they need for deeper learning?

Although these competitions took place over a decade ago, the students developed five design concepts that are as relevant today as when they were originally drafted.

  1. Co-Created Curriculum
  2. Collaborative Learning
  3. Commitments from Capable Adults
  4. Connected Learning – Doing Real Work
  5. Comfortable, Customizable Learning Space

 

 

10 classroom ideas to try in 2015 — from blogs.edweek.org by Jennie Magiera

 

 

Karl Kapp “The Case of the Disengaged Learner” #ATDTK — from cammybean.kineo.com by Cammy Bean
These are my liveblogged notes from Karl Kapp’s session at ATD TechKnowledge, happening this week in Las Vegas. Forgive any typos or incoherencies.

Excerpt (emphasis DSC):

Start instruction with ACTION and not objectives.  Draw the learner in with action and encourage engagement. Make the learner do something. Have them identify something right away; make a decision right away; answer a question. Give them a complicated problem to solve. Confront a challenge. Create a curiosity gap — something you can do before hand that will raise a question that they want to know the answer to.

Law & Order (the tv) creates open loops — you HAVE to watch to the end to find out what happens. Leave them on a cliffhanger…it pulls you along.

In ID we create a closed loop: “by the end of this module, you will learn…”  Instead open with “Do you know the #1 method to close sales in our company. Find out in this module.”

Start with a question that pulls the learner in – this creates an OPEN LOOP that draws them into the instruction. Don’t lead with the objectives (you still need ’em to design your instruction).

Create a challenging experience. Don’t make it frustrating, but create some struggle to get to the answer. Our best experiences are when we have that ah-ha moment, that breakthrough.

Add novelty. New and different catches our attention.

Also see Karl’s slides of “The Case of the Disengaged Learner

 

 

 

Excerpt from Cammy Bean’s posting:  David Kelly “Building a Learning Strategy from an Ecosystem of Resources” #ATDTK (emphasis DSC)

So what is a learning and performance ecosystem? It’s an organic entity that evolves over time. It’s finding the resources all around that support performance (not just training!). We’ve got multiple systems in our orgs — in a well-run org, those systems are all connected.

It’s a new mindset for those in L&D and training.

 

 

 

3 predictions for the future of jobs — from agenda.weforum.org by Kristel Van der Elst and Trudi Lan

  • A coming age of entrepreneurship:
    Advances in technology will make self-generated livelihoods increasingly more viable
  • Retire first, work later?
    In the future, our work-life duality patterns may change substantially
  • The new jobs robots can’t take:
    We will soon see a plethora of jobs that currently do not exist

 

Also see:
Global Strategic Foresight Community – Members’ Perspectives on Global Shifts
As an extension of its own Strategic Foresight practice, the World Economic Forum has established a new community initiative, the Global Strategic Foresight Community (GSFC). A diverse, multistakeholder group, it brings together eminent and forward-looking thought leaders and senior practitioners from leading public, private and civil society organizations. The purpose of the Global Strategic Foresight Community is to provide a peer network to compare and contrast insights as well as to positively shape future-related industry, regional and global agendas. Below you will find information about the members as well as their foresight perspectives  on “global shifts”. These shifts concern topics or issues which GSFC members believe should be highlighted now and added to the agendas of the Forum and relevant organizations to inspire constructive action for the future.

 

 

From Jobs of the future — from theguardian.com

Example job titles in 2020  — for education

  • Online education broker
    Tailors a bespoke learning package for the client, dovetailing relevant modules from courses and syllabuses around the world.
  • Space tour guide
    With Virgin Galactic planning commercial flights from 2011, space tourists will need cosmic enthusiasts to shed light on all that darkness.

 

 

What Are the Top Jobs and Skills of the Future? [Infographic] — from youtern.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

From DSC:
It seems like there’s been an increase in the number of “boot camps” that I’m seeing — below are some examples:


 

12week-boot-camp-data-scientist

 

 

 

 

UX-10-WeekImmersiveTraining-OCt2014

 

 

 

 

FlatironSchool

 

 

 

 

.

PayWhatYouWantBootcamp-Jan2015

 

 

 

 

ElevenFifty-CodingAcademy-Jan2015

 

 

 

 

New MOOC Platform Provides Free IT Certification Courses — from campustechnology.com by Rhea Kelly

 

 

Cybrary-IT-Jan2015

 

 

 

People offering their own bootcamps / building their own brands; such as this Two Week Web Development Bootcamp for Beginners by Adam Stanford.

 

 

 


Some other approaches that are occurring:


 

Ideo U

IDEO-Online-EducationBeta-Oct2014

 

Yieldr Academy

YieldrAcademy-Sept2014

Lessons Go Where

LessonsGoWhere

 

ClassDo

ClassDo

 

Udemy

udemy

 

C-Suite TV.com

MYOB-July2014

 

 

Simon & Schuster to sell online courses taught by popular authors — from nytimes.com by Alexandra Alter; with thanks to Sidneyeve Matrix for her Tweet on this

Excerpt:

Simon & Schuster is making a push into paid online video, with a new website offering online courses from popular health, finance and self-help authors.

The cost of the first batch of online courses ranges from $25 to $85, and includes workbooks and access to live question-and-answer sessions with three authors: Dr. David B. Agus, the best-selling author of “The End of Illness”; Zhena Muzyka, who wrote the self-help book “Life by the Cup”; and Tosha Silver, the author of the spiritual advice book “Outrageous Openness.” The courses will be available on the authors’ individual websites and on the company’s new site, SimonSays.

.

 

Simon-Schuster-OnlineCourses-Jan2015

But there is a new wave of online competency-based learning providers that has absolutely nothing to do with offering free, massive, or open courses. In fact, they’re not even building courses per se, but creating a whole new architecture of learning that has serious implications for businesses and organizations around the world.

It’s called online competency-based education, and it’s going to revolutionize the workforce.

The key distinction is the modularization of learning.

Here’s why business leaders should care: the resulting stackable credential reveals identifiable skillsets and dispositions that mean something to an employer. As opposed to the black box of the diploma, competencies lead to a more transparent system that highlights student-learning outcomes.

 

 


From DSC:
Though several of the items above have a slant towards IT/coding/programming, other disciplines may be impacted by these types of trends as well.

These developments are meant for consideration for those of us working within higher education. What do they mean for us? Should they inform more of our strategies? Our visions? Our responses?


 

Addendums on 2/17/15:

 

datasciencedojo-bootcamp-2015

 

 

 

 

Addendum on 3/27/15:

 

Addendum on 4/1/15 — with thanks to Mr. Cal Keen at Calvin College

 

CanvasDotNet-April2015

 

Addendum on 4/7/15:

  • Udemy alternatives for selling video courses online — from robcubbon.com
    Udemy is currently the leading online learning platform. Their top 10 instructors all made over $500,000 last year and the top earner makes over $8 million. I make $4000+ each month by selling courses on Udemy.

 

 

Addendum on 5/1/15:

worldacademy.tv

WorldAcademyDotTV-May2015

 

Addendum on 5/18/15:

  • 16 Startups Poised to Disrupt the Education Market — from inc.com by Ilan Mochari
    Colleges and universities are facing new competition for customers–students and their parents–from startups delivering similar goods (knowledge, credentials, prestige) more affordably and efficiently. Here’s a rundown of some of those startups.
 

Five Minute Film Festival: Video Boot Camp — from edutopia.org by Bill Selak

Excerpt:

The rapid adoption of devices in the classroom has fundamentally changed the way we can create video. Every part of the creation process — writing, recording, editing, and distributing — is possible on the devices that can fit in our pocket. Vision is the most dominant of the five senses. Research shows that concepts are better remembered if they are taught visually. This is called the pictorial superiority effect, and it’s why video is such a powerful learning tool.

A video is created three times: when you write it, when you shoot it, and when you edit it. There are several formats that can be used to write a script for the classroom: a Google Doc, a dedicated app (ex: Storyboards), a Google Form, or a production organization document. Whichever format is used, emphasis should be placed on how it will be used in the classroom, and what the goal of the video is. When recording, it is important to incorporate basic rules of composition, such as the rule of thirds, into your video. Being aware of the environment (basic concepts like lighting and room tone) makes it easier to edit.

Curating content is another significant way to incorporate video into your classroom. If you don’t have the time or software to make a fancy video, odds are someone has already made it and shared it on YouTube. This Film Festival is equal parts curation and creation.

 

From DSC:
This is a nice collection of resources and tips to help you and your students further develop your new media literacy.

 

 

 

 

Running your company at two speeds — from mckinsey.com by Oliver Bossert, Jürgen Laartz, and Tor Jakob Ramsøy
Digital competition may dictate a new organizational architecture in which emerging digital processes coexist with traditional ones.

Excerpt (emphasis DSC):

The retailer’s board responded by creating a new budgeting and approval process in which projects supporting major digital strategic thrusts are now treated separately from the rest of the IT budget. Solutions like this, in our experience, are an effective means of addressing digital timing challenges. Many companies need to create a two-speed architecture—a fast speed for functions that address evolving customer experiences and must change rapidly, and a transaction speed for the remaining functions, where the pace of adjustment can remain more measured.

Make the digital dialogue more strategic
Solutions like the retailer’s work only if there is clear agreement on what constitutes a digital priority worthy of a fast speed. In our experience, that rarely happens, because far too often, the digital dialogue never becomes sufficiently strategic to galvanize top management. At the retailer, by contrast, top management brought its budgeting challenges to the board, which approved the new, two-speed ground rules. Top management has also begun revising its agenda to elevate the importance of discussing strategic technology initiatives, including comparisons between them and other major thrusts, such as entering new regions.

Achieving this level of dialogue often means changing mind-sets, such as the common one that IT spending is a “tax” required to “keep the lights on.” …Once it’s clear that certain types of technology spending are an investment in new business strategies, it becomes much easier to agree that the resulting initiatives should be implemented quickly.

Evolve the organization
When the IT organization is asked to release new digital functions on a faster deployment cycle, it requires new levels of agility and coordination that may require substantial organizational change.

 

 

Along these lines, see:

How administrators can enhance online learning programs — from ecampusnews.com by Meris Stansbury

Excerpt (emphasis DSC):

Studying the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities (CCCU), Hoey and other researchers from Crown College, Fresno Pacific University, and Trinity Christian College examined the impact of administrative structure and admins on the outcomes of online student enrollment, number of online programs, and efficiency of online operations.

What the study overwhelmingly found was that both admins and admin structure have significant influence, which could help “private colleges gain a foothold in the competitive online market.”

However, since around 2007, researchers have noted a move away from the fully-integrated model to one where online programs are operated and administered by an entirely separate academic division.

 

Romans 5:18-19 [The Message]

Here it is in a nutshell: Just as one person did it wrong and got us in all this trouble with sin and death, another person did it right and got us out of it. But more than just getting us out of trouble, he got us into life! One man said no to God and put many people in the wrong; one man said yes to God and put many in the right.

 

The difference between STEM and STEAM — from dailygenius.com by Jeff Dunn; infographic by the University of Florida

Excerpt:

  • Students who study arts for 4 years in high school score 98 points higher on the SATs compared to those who study the same for half a year or less.
  • Students who took up music appreciation scored 61 points higher on the verbal section and 42 points higher on the math section.
  • Of the elementary schools with arts, the most common subjects revolve around music at 94% and visual studies at 83%. Only 3% offer dance instruction while 4% provide theater arts.
  • Training in the arts has been shown to improve creativity and innovation. Students learn to approach issues with a critical mind and a positive attitude towards problem solving. Exposure to the arts enhances communication skills, which are essential tools for collaboration. It develops flexibility and adaptability. The government recognizes these and, indeed, 48 states have adopted standards for art instructions.
  • 51% of art teachers are unhappy about what they see as the decline in art education brought about by the shift in focus. The difficulty in measuring art’s contribution to academic performance has led to its under appreciation.

 

Internet of Everything: 2015 [slide deck] — from businessinsider.com

Excerpt:

BI Intelligence has created a slideshow highlighting the most important ways the Internet of Everything market will develop, the benefits newly connected devices will offer consumers and businesses, and the potential barriers that could inhibit growth.

 

 

BI-SlideDeck-IoE-Jan2015

 

 

NumberDevices-BI-SlideDeck-Jan2015

 

 

 
© 2024 | Daniel Christian